Howland v. Andrus
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 80 N. J. Eq. {10 Buch.) 276.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Treno piard, J.
The hill in this case was filed by Henry S. Howland against Pauline E. Andrus, to enjoin- an alleged violation of a building *176line restriction. The court of chancery awarded an injunction and the defendant appeals.
It appears by the pleadings and evidence that Joseph Bardslev was the owner of a tract of land in the town of Montclair, lying between Park street on the east and Valley road and North View avenue on the west, being about nine hundred feet in length by five hundred feet in width. He laid out the land in building lots, with a…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Building Inspector v. McInerneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Hickson v. Noroton Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Rhinehart v. LeitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Brown v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.