Forrest Construction, Inc. v. Milam
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
This appeal comes from a chancery decree enjoining appellant from subdividing certain lots and from selling certain lots that had already been subdivided in the Meadowbrook South Addition in the city of Greenwood. The chancellor also refused to enforce a sewer easement over land owned by appellees Donnie and Carol Whitson, and awarded appellees $23,579.65 in attorney fees. Appellant contends on appeal that the chancellor’s rulings were erroneous; appellees ask that we dismiss the appeal on the grounds of mootness and lack of standing. We affirm the trial court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Constant v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Hickson v. Noroton Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Cotten v. FooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Manila School District No. 15 v. WagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Glover v. Woodhaven Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Lee v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.