Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Peabody

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1885No. 11,909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Starke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

On the 13th day of December, 1882, the appellee, Peabody, as sole plaintiff, commenced this suit against the appellant Rowe and William Perry, auditor of Starke county, and Francis Smith, attorney-in-fact for William Rowe, as defendants. Afterwards, on December 28th, 1882, the parties appeared in open court, and, on appellee’s motion, it was *199•ordered by the court that upon appellee’s filing his written undertaking with surety to the court’s approval, the appellant Rowe should be enjoined, until the first day of the next term of court and its further order herein, from receiving, .and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McWhinney v. BrinkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Lancaster v. DuHadwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Harrison v. HaasIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Lang v. OppenheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Morrison v. JacobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API