Legal Opinion

Browning v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1894No. 15,844PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs below, filed in the Marion Circuit Court a complaint of one paragraph in the usual form to quiet title to seven lots, numbered 114, 133, 134, 360, 361, 362 and 363, respectively, in H. R. Allen’s second north addition to the city of Indianapolis. A general denial completed the issues and a trial was had, resulting in a finding and judgment for the appellees.

On May 13, 1889, the appellants took a new trial as a matter of right, and thereupon a new trial was had, likewise resulting in a finding and judgment for the appellees. Special findings and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lantz v. MaffettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Latshaw v. State ex rel. LatshawIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Noble v. DavisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reed v. KalesbeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Union National Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HelbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API