Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Lokensky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 4, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment as a payroll coordinator without good cause. The record establishes that claimant and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of BarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of FilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re ZevallosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of PainoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re PolisenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of Zhen Feng HuangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005