Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Roman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 14, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 20, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a program director for a health care *1068agency for nearly three years. He resigned from his position because he felt that his supervisor was verbally and sexually harassing him, and was also discriminating against him in the assignment of work projects. Upon finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AdorisioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of LokenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DiolosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of AyadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of LoggheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim UblAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.