Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Peterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 28, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked for the employer for more than 11 years until she resigned in November 1999. According to claimant, she had been repeatedly harassed by her supervisor, who issued a number of warning letters to claimant which she challenged through an available grievance procedure. When the supervisor issued three more warning letters on a single day in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of IkoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of GiaffoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of RitchieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LokenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of GinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API