Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Paino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 2, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 26, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a sales manager for a science supply company from June 1998 until October 2004. He resigned from his position because the nature of his job had changed from a focus on teaching and training to sales. After he left his position, he applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of Hobson-WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of LokenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of FlorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CarcaterraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of MolinariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Claim of MolendaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of Pierre-LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of Pierre-LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013