In re the Claim of Fil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 24, 1989, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Criticism of an employee’s work by a supervisor does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (Matter of Hogan [Schenectady Discount Corp.—Levine], 50 AD2d 650). What constitutes good cause is a question of fact for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve (Matter of Steed [Roberts] 115 AD2d 166). In this case, the Board found…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Claim of HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of LabissiereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of LokenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Aponte v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994