Legal Opinion

State v. Hankins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 825SC1347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

We believe we are bound by State v. Rushing, 61 N.C. App. 62, 300 S.E. 2d 445, aff’d, 308 N.C. 804, 303 S.E. 2d 822 (1983) to hold there was not sufficient evidence that the defendant intended to commit rape at the time he entered the house for a charge of first degree burglary to have been submitted to the jury. In Rushing there was evidence that the prosecuting witness was awakened by the defendant as he came through her bedroom window. When she asked for his identity the defendant said, “Don’t holler, don’t scream, I got a gun, I’ll shoot you,” and came to the side of the bed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. RedmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. RushingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. LamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Matter of MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API