Legal Opinion

Matter of Mitchell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1987No. 8712DC104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Respondent contends that the trial court “erred in concluding that the alleged delinquent act, burglary in the first degree, N.C.G.S. § 14-51, was proven by the State’s evidence.” We agree.

In order to sustain a conviction, there must be proof of every essential element of the crime charged. State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). The essential elements of first degree burglary include breaking and entering a dwelling at nighttime, with the intent to commit a felony therein. State v. Wells, 290 N.C. 485, 226 S.E. 2d 325 (1976).

The felony alleged to have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. LamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re EadesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re B.E.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. IN THE MATTER OF MLLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. KeittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. MimsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API