Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1991No. 9018SC732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to sever the offenses for trial and in overruling his objection to joinder. We disagree.

G.S. 15A-926(a) provides:

Joinder of Offenses. — Two or more offenses may be joined in one pleading or for trial when the offenses, whether felonies or misdemeanors or both, are based on the same act or transaction or on a series of acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan.

Joinder motions are addressed to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. FriendCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API