State v. Simpson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant argues five assignments of error on appeal. We have carefully reviewed each assignment and find that the trial court committed no error which would entitle defendant to a new trial.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his inculpatory statement made to law enforcement officers on 12 April 1976 at the Police Administration Building in Philadelphia. He contends that when law enforcement officers requested that he accompany them to the Police Administration Building, he was “arrested” without a warrant and without probable…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- James E. Davis v. Harry L. Allsbrooks, Warden of the Northhampton Co. Prison State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.