Legal Opinion

Bernal v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1990No. G007774PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, J. *

Plaintiffs Morris and Rosie Bernal appeal from a judgment for Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation (Wolf) in their action for personal injuries. During Morris’s knee surgery, arthroscopic scissors distributed and warranted by Wolf broke, causing the injury. Plaintiffs’ case was predicated, in part, on a strict products liability theory for an allegedly defectively designed instrument, and on breach of warranty. On appeal, they raise instructional error. We reverse.

I

In March 1980, Wolf sold a pair of arthroscopic scissors to Mercy Hospital. In November 1984, Morris…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Marlow v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Ford v. Polaris Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. National Medical Transportation Network v. Deloitte & ToucheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API