Legal Opinion
Marlow v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 2, 1991No. 1-90-2648PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan
The plaintiffs individually and as representatives of a class sought a declaratory judgment that a motor vehicle manufactured by Suzuki Motor Companies and sold to 150,000 persons throughout the United States was defectively designed.
The plaintiffs were Natheree Marlow, Frank Forest and Heidi Gallegos, individually and as representatives of a class of all persons who purchased or leased or were or are owners or lessees of the Suzuki Samurai automobile; and Vacountess Marlow and Virginia Gallegos, individually and as representatives of a class of all persons who were injured during the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Kessinger v. Grefco, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Mayfair Construction Co. v. Waveland Associates Phase I Limited PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- AG Farms, Inc. v. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.