Legal Opinion
Gerzsenyi v. Richardson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 18, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
211 N.J. Super. 213 (1986)
511 A.2d 699
ZOLTAN GERZSENYI AND EDITH GERZSENYI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM C. RICHARDSON AND HOUSE OF HARLEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 19, 1986.
Decided June 18, 1986.
Before Judges FURMAN, PETRELLA and SKILLMAN.
Harvey Levine argued the cause for appellants (Ploshnick & Levine, attorneys; Gary M. Weiss, on the brief).
Stephen J. Spudic argued the cause for respondents (Britt & Riehl, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, J.A.D.
Plaintiffs appeal the denial of their motion for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waite v. DoeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Michel v. MichelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Cotter v. DoddNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Cuccurullo v. MeskinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Zois v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Sprowl v. KitselmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Security National Bank of Enid, Oklahoma v. John Deere Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Corcoran v. St. Peter's Med. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.