Sprowl v. Kitselman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
267 N.J. Super. 602 (1993)
632 A.2d 540
JOHN H. SPROWL AND NANCY SPROWL H/W AND SPROWL AMBULANCE SERVICE INC., D/B/A SPROWL AMBULANCE TRANSPORT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS G. KITSELMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. DONATO IPPOLITO AND JOSEPHINE IPPOLITO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GREATER PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL, VANDEETO ASSOCIATION, GREATER PATERSON GENERAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING AND JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH X, (X BEING A NUMBER AS YET UNDETERMINED) BEING PERSONS OR CORPORATIONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE PRESENTLY UNKNOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heffner v. JacobsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Gerzsenyi v. RichardsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hartsfield v. FantiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Schor v. FMS Financial Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- O'Neill v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Zois v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.