Legal Opinion

Sprowl v. Kitselman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 29, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

267 N.J. Super. 602 (1993)

632 A.2d 540

JOHN H. SPROWL AND NANCY SPROWL H/W AND SPROWL AMBULANCE SERVICE INC., D/B/A SPROWL AMBULANCE TRANSPORT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS G. KITSELMAN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. DONATO IPPOLITO AND JOSEPHINE IPPOLITO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GREATER PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL, VANDEETO ASSOCIATION, GREATER PATERSON GENERAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING AND JOHN DOE 1 THROUGH X, (X BEING A NUMBER AS YET UNDETERMINED) BEING PERSONS OR CORPORATIONS WHOSE IDENTITIES ARE PRESENTLY UNKNOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heffner v. JacobsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Gerzsenyi v. RichardsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartsfield v. FantiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Schor v. FMS Financial Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. O'Neill v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Zois v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API