Legal Opinion

Zois v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXP.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

286 N.J. Super. 670 (1996)

670 A.2d 92

ANTHONY ZOIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 21, 1995.

Decided January 25, 1996.

Before Judges DREIER, KESTIN[1] and CUFF.

Maria L. Zarrella argued the cause for appellant (Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, attorneys; Jack A. Maloof, of counsel, Ms. Zarrella, on the brief).

Pasquale F. Giannetta argued the cause for respondent (Fuhro & Hanley, attorneys; Mr. Giannetta, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, P.J.A.D.

D…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. S.E.W. Friel Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Lamb v. Global Landfill ReclaimingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Hammond v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Escalante v. Tp. of CinnaminsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. AmedioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Lowe v. ZarghamiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. D.D. v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Rogers v. Cape May County OfficeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. O'Neill v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API