Legal Opinion

Cuccurullo v. Meskin

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 21, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

204 N.J. Super. 386 (1985)

498 A.2d 1300

CHRISTINE CUCCURULLO, PLAINTIFF,

v.

MARK D. MESKIN, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County.

June 21, 1985.

Lawrence M. Lawson for plaintiff (Lawson & Butler, Attorneys).

Robert D. Faccone for defendant (Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, Attorneys).

OPINION

MILBERG, A.J.S.C.

Plaintiff Christine Cuccurullo filed a notice of motion for a trial de novo.

The case was arbitrated on April 26, 1985, at which time an award was handed down. Rule 10B(1) of the statewide rules governing automobile arbitration expressly limits the time for trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baumann v. MarinaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Moich v. PASSAIC TERMINAL & TRANSPORTATION CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Gerzsenyi v. RichardsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Lawrence v. MatusewskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API