Legal Opinion
Paige Martin v. Gary Yasuda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 2016No. 15-55696PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Gary Yasuda and Amarillo College of Hairdressing appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The district court found that the defendants waived their right to arbi tration by their litigation conduct. We affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant Amarillo College of Hairdressing, Inc., doing business as “Milan Institute” and “Milan Institute of Cosmetology” (collectively “Milan”), is a group of nationally accredited private colleges offering career training in cosmetology. The plaintiffs are individuals who enrolled in a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. PyettSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Tiffany Hill v. Xerox Business Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- June Newirth v. Aegis Senior Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Teresa Armstrong v. Michaels Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Dimitri Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.