Legal Opinion

Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 2010No. 08-1198PublishedCited by 1,229 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether imposing class arbitration on parties whose arbitration clauses are “silent” on that issue is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq.

I

A

Petitioners are shipping companies that serve a large share of the world market for parcel tankers — seagoing vessels with compartments that are separately chartered to customers wishing to ship liquids in small quantities. One of those customers is AnimalFeeds International Corp. (hereinafter AnimalFeeds), which supplies raw ingredients, such as fish oil, to animal-feed…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,229 opinions

  1. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

1,224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API