Legal Opinion

14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 2009No. 07-581PublishedCited by 404 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The question presented by this case is whether a provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 81 Stat. 602, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 621 et seq., is enforceable. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that this Court’s decision in Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U. S. 36 (1974), forbids enforcement of such arbitration provisions. We disagree and reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

I

Respondents are members of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by404 opinions

  1. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API