United States v. 50 Acres of Land
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The Fifth Amendment requires that the United States pay “just compensation” — normally measured by fair market value1 — whenever it takes private property for public *26use.2 This case involves the condemnation of property owned by a municipality. The question is whether a public condemnee is entitled to compensation measured by the cost of acquiring a substitute facility if it has a duty to replace the condemned facility. We hold that this measure of compensation is not required when the market value of the condemned property is ascertainable.
I
In 1978, as part of a flood control project, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.