Legal Opinion

United States v. 50 Acres of Land

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1984No. 83-1170PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The Fifth Amendment requires that the United States pay “just compensation” — normally measured by fair market value1 — whenever it takes private property for public *26use.2 This case involves the condemnation of property owned by a municipality. The question is whether a public condemnee is entitled to compensation measured by the cost of acquiring a substitute facility if it has a duty to replace the condemned facility. We hold that this measure of compensation is not required when the market value of the condemned property is ascertainable.

I

In 1978, as part of a flood control project, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Harlingen v. Estate of SharboneauTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Metlyn Realty Corp. v. Esmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Horne v. Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API