Legal Opinion
Horne v. Department of Agriculture
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 22, 2015No. 14–275PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
Under the United States Department of Agriculture's California Raisin Marketing Order, a percentage of a grower's crop must be physically set aside in certain years for the account of the Government, free of charge. The Government then sells, allocates, or otherwise disposes of the raisins in ways it determines are best suited to maintaining an orderly market. The question is whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment bars the Government from imposing such a demand on the growers without just compensation.
I
The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 authorizes the Secretary of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Murr v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Meryl Squires-Cannon v. Forest Preserve District of CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Ass'n of N.J. Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. v. Attorney Gen. N.J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.