State v. . Ratcliff
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, C. J.,
after stating the case: In considering a case of burglary, attention should first be given to the form of the bill of indictment, which may be drawn in one of three ways: First, by charging the breaking and entry to be with intent to commit a designated felony, second, by charging the breaking and entry, and a designated felony actually committed; and, third, by charging the breaking and entry, with intent to commit a designated felony, and also charging the actual commission of said designated felony. S. v. Allen, 186 N. C., 302, 119 S. E., 504.
The form of the present bill…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- State v. . FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.