Legal Opinion
Leahy v. Warden
California Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1912No. L.A. No. 2780PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This cause was transferred to the district court of appeal for the second district for decision. In that court the judgment was affirmed upon the following opinion prepared by Justice Allen:
“The action was one to foreclose a mortgage executed to plaintiff’s assignor by one Jackson, defendants’ grantor. The note and mortgage were dated August 15, 1908; note due three years after date, bearing interest at the rate of 11 per cent per annum, with a condition that if default be made in the payment of any installment of interest the principal should become due, at the option of the holder.
“The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Savings Bank v. AsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Burke v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Sketchley v. LipkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Douglas v. KlopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Stephens v. AhrensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bailey v. MingeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917