Burke v. Gould
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover from defendant $679.78, alleged to have been paid to him by plaintiff, under duress of the property of said plaintiff.
■ Plaintiff had a verdict for $652.48, upon which judgment was entered. The appeal is by defendant from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
On the twenty-first day of February, 1890, plaintiff *279executed to defendant and Mary M. Barnes a mortgage upon certain real property situate in the county of Santa Barbara, to secure the payment of two certain promissory notes aggregating $17,000, payable one year after…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Scholey v. . MumfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Briggs v. . BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Kohler v. Wells, Fargo & Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
- Buck v. AxtIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Johnson v. FordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.