Legal Opinion

People v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The defendant has been convicted of unlawfully practicing podiatry, by the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, one justice dissenting. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the conviction, and the appeal is here by permission of a judge of this court.

The undisputed facts are as follows: The appellant is a Delaware corporation, which operates a chain of stores selling at retail shoes for men, women and children. One of the stores is located in Manhattan. This store employs, in addition to the regular shoe salesmen, a duly licensed chiropodist and a registered nurse who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Matter of Dickson v. FlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Pratter v. LascoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut Chiropody Society, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Staley v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. People v. Sterling Optical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Darby v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API