Legal Opinion
Staley v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1952No. Civ. 18637PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
For approximately 20 years plaintiff has been in the business of fitting and selling shoes. In connection therewith he has been manufacturing, recommending and selling corrective shoes and appliances for the human foot, to wit: arch supports. He uses a conventional measuring rule to get the customer’s shoe size, and with a pedograph he takes a footprint “to get the curve of the arch.” With this information he proceeds to make a “support to fit in the shoe, so the shoe fits better.” If the customer is not pleased with the supports, he is free to return them and get his money back.
By his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Zimmer v. GorelnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Cook v. WinklepleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Knox v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.