Legal Opinion

Darby v. Cohen

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*517OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiff contends that his injuries were caused by the malpractice of two physicians and a podiatrist. Called as a witness for the plaintiff to substantiate his contentions was his expert, a physician specializing in general surgery. When asked a hypothetical question relating to the standard of care of podiatrists and any deviation therefrom, counsel for the podiatrist objected on the ground that a physician cannot qualify as an expert in podiatric care and thus any opinion that he may render with respect to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. PreisNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Kletnieks v. Brookhaven Memorial Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Taormina v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. People v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandford v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Marshall v. Yale Podiatry GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. McDonnell v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API