Legal Opinion
Matter of Dickson v. Flynn
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The purposes for which the Four-BoroOptical Corporation is to be organized, as set forth in its certificate of incorporation, conform with the provisions of section 1432-a of the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16) (Roschen v. Ward, 279 U. S. 337), and the objection by appellant appearing in the affidavit of the acting chief of the Division of Corporations is not sufficient to warrant refusal to file and record this certificate. We do not construe the wording of the proposed certificate of incorporation as authorizing the practice of optometry.
At this time we decide no other issue. If, in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Williams v. MackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- People v. Sterling Optical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. Dr. Scholl's Foot Comfort Shops, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Posner v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.