Legal Opinion

Connecticut Chiropody Society, Inc. v. Murray

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 7, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The named plaintiff is a corporation without capital stock, and all its members, seven of whom joined as individual parties plaintiff, are duly licensed active practitioners of chiropody under what is now chapter 375 of the Revision of 1958. Since there have been no statutory changes material to the decision of this case since its institution, for convenience statutory references will be made to that revision. The basic claim of the plaintiffs is that the defendant Murray Space Shoe Corporation and four individual defendants who are stockholders or agents of that corporation are carrying on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Park Regional Corporation v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Colli v. Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API