Legal Opinion
City of Arvada v. Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1999No. 97CA1829PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge VOGT.
In this action for breach of an insurance contract, plaintiff, City of Arvada (Arvada), appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA). We affirm.
CIRSA is a public entity self-insurance pool that provides claims services to its member municipalities. At all times relevant to this action, CIRSA and its members, including Arvada, were named insureds under a Lloyd’s of London insurance policy which provided comprehensive general liability (CGL) and errors and omissions liability (E & O) coverage.
In November…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Simon v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- City of Arvada v. Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing AgencySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Nicholls v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Snipes v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HolwuttleColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.