Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ROYIRA, Justice.
We granted certiorari pursuant to C.A.R. 50 to review an order of the Larimer County District Court which, relying on Bartlett v. Continental Divide Insurance Co., 697 P.2d 412 (Colo.App.1984), held that the damage to petitioners’ property was caused by a flood. The trial court then found that the insurance policies issued by the respondents did not provide coverage for the losses claimed by petitioners and granted the respondents’ motions for summary judgment.
The issues on which we granted the petition are: (1) Whether the failure of Lawn Lake Dam, causing water to inundate…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Christmas v. CooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Martinez Ex Rel. Sprague v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.