Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Stein
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 30, 1997No. 96SC283PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
We granted certiorari in this case to review the court of appeals opinion in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Stein, 924 P.2d 1154 (Colo.App.1996) (Stein II). We now affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and hold that a bicyclist is not a “pedestrian” within the meaning of the uninsured motorist (UM) coverage portion of the automobile insurance policies issued by the petitioner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), and thus conclude that the “anti-stacking” provi*386sion in the policies does not preclude the respondent Renee W. Stein’s (Stein) claim for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Parrish Chiropractic Centers, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Kral v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Cotter Corp. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Allen v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- TBL Collectibles, Inc. v. Owners Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.