Legal Opinion

Snipes v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2006No. 04CA1650PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVogt, J.

Plaintiff, Antonio Snipes, Sr., appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.

In November 2000, plaintiff purchased an automobile policy from defendant that included basic personal injury protection (PIP) coverage with a $100,000 limit on benefits for medical and rehabilitation expenses and other limits on work loss benefits. In December 2001, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. When the amount of his claims reached the policy limits, plaintiff advised defendant that the policy did not meet statutory requirements…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Grange Insurance Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. DiCocco v. National General Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Federal Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  4. r & Fellman, PC v. Affiniti Colorado, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API