Miller v. . Greenwood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBabNHill, J.
There are numerous assignments of error. Some of these are broadside in nature, including a number of questions and answers. These do not properly present any question for our decision.
The burden rested upon the plaintiff to show want of probable cause. Intent was an essential element of the crime with which he had been charged. . Therefore, the evidence as to the efforts the plaintiff made to give the defendant notice that the automobile had been wrecked and as to his conversations with the defendant’s employee Reece was competent on the question of scienter if for no other reason. Likewise,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Carpenter, Baggott & Co. v. HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Mooney v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Dupree v. Virginia Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Gregg v. . Mallett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Crist v. MoffattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.