Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Flesher
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1927No. Docket No. 1451PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an application for the writ of habeas corpus and from the petition and return thereto it appears that the petitioner was charged with violating the Corporate Securities Act. The complaint shows that on the fifth day of October, 1926, petitioner knowingly, wilfully, and unlawfully sold ten shares of the capital stock of the Julian Merger Mines, Incorporated, which corporation did not at the time have a permit from the commissioner of corporations of the state of California authorizing it to sell or issue any of its securities. It also shows that the Julian Merger Mines, Incorporated,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hart v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Young v. Three for One Oil RoyaltiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. SobieskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Gillis v. Pan American Western Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Edwards v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.