Legal Opinion
Donald M. Drake Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 30, 1987No. 376-86CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
*519FACTS
In September 1982, Donald M. Drake Company (“plaintiff”) and the Veteran’s Administration (the “VA”) entered into construction contract No. V101C-1083. The contract called for plaintiff to construct a 490-bed replacement hospital in Portland, Oregon. In accordance with article 11 of the contract, plaintiff requested that Ira A. Wikstrom, Project Manager, be assigned to the subject project to act on its behalf. The VA did not raise any objections to this assignment.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Milmark Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- T.J.D. Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- United Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Romala Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
3Cited by24 opinions
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- The United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Triax Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.