Romala Corp. v. United States

OPINION

NAPIER, Judge:

Plaintiff, Romala Corporation (Romala), initiated this direct access contract action pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 601, et seq. (1982). The defendant has moved this Court to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction based upon plaintiff’s alleged failure to properly certify its claim. Plaintiff, in response, *412argues that its claim is properly certified and meets the requirements of the Contract Disputes Act. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and the complaint is to be dismissed without prejudice.

Facts