Klein v. Barry
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
We have not set out nor referred to all of the matters appearing in the record, but have set forth enough to present fairly the questions raised upon this appeal.
It is argued by Messrs. Williams & Williams, amici curia, that, independently of the provisions of sec. 1753 — 57 of the Statutes of 1921, the investigation by the Railroad Commission may proceed under other provisions of the act and that therefore the injunction was properly denied. A consideration of the whole record convinces us that, whatever the Railroad Commission might have done, it was in fact proceeding exclusively under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Buell v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Wisniewski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Kreutzer v. WestfahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Town of Holland v. Village of Cedar GroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Provenzano v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Kelley v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.