Provenzano v. Long
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
In a common law action for negligence tried to the court below without a jury, plaintiff Joe Long recovered a judgment against the defendant for $4,880. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial and relies mainly upon the contention, not made in the court below, but raised here for the first time, that the district court had no jurisdiction to try the action, for the alleged reason that the Nevada industrial commission had exclusive jurisdiction to try and determine the matter. As the question raised is a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. HendersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nevada Industrial Commission v. ReeseNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Travelers Insurance Company v. SneddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Meinhold v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Voorhees v. SpencerNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- MGM MIRAGE v. CottonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.