Legal Opinion
Mutua v. TEXAS ROADHOUSE MANAGEMENT CORP.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 10, 2010No. Civ. 09-4080-KESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Michelleé Mutua, an African-American female, filed an employment discrimination suit against her employer, Texas Roadhouse, the Sioux Fall store’s managing partner, Murray Welder, and the Sioux Falls market partner, Thomas Scheel (defendants). Mutua alleges discrimination and retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII, and the South Dakota Human Rights Act, and a breach of contract claim under South Dakota state law. Mutua also seeks punitive damages. Defendants…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Salazar v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Clayton v. Vanguard Car Rental U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Garrison v. Citibank NADistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Harris v. Wehco Video IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022