Legal Opinion
Lindner v. Lund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1984No. CO-83-1745PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Presiding Judge.
Appellants Michael and Cindy Lindner appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the respondents, Audry and Paul Lund. In their personal injury action, the Lindners claimed permanent in jury or disability of 60 days or more to Michael Lindner as a result of an automobile accident. The trial court entered summary judgment after ruling that appellants failed to meet the tort thresholds to maintain a claim for negligence and recover noneconomic benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
After appellants brought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- William R. Jewson v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. GearmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Norwest Bank Fire CasesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.