Legal Opinion

United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1987No. C4-87-302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal questions the trial court’s conclusion, as a matter of law, that appellant failed to prove the parties entered into an enforceable oral modification of their lease. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1974, appellant United Artists Communications entered into a 25-year written lease agreement with Homart Development Company. The lease required United Artists to pay dues of $.20 per square foot of its leased space per year to the Maplewood Mall Merchants’ Association, payable monthly. This provision was “subject to annual upward adjustments approved by a two-thirds majority of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Taylor v. MoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Randall v. Lady of America Franchise Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. McNeill & Associates, Inc. v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. American Bank of St. Paul v. Coating Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API