United Artists Communications, Inc. v. Corporate Property Investors
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal questions the trial court’s conclusion, as a matter of law, that appellant failed to prove the parties entered into an enforceable oral modification of their lease. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1974, appellant United Artists Communications entered into a 25-year written lease agreement with Homart Development Company. The lease required United Artists to pay dues of $.20 per square foot of its leased space per year to the Maplewood Mall Merchants’ Association, payable monthly. This provision was “subject to annual upward adjustments approved by a two-thirds majority of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Taylor v. MoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Randall v. Lady of America Franchise Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- McNeill & Associates, Inc. v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- American Bank of St. Paul v. Coating Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.