Legal Opinion
Paganini v. Town of Corte Madera
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1950No. Civ. 14232PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in quo warranto, annulling proceedings for the annexation of certain territory.
On June 3, 1946, pursuant to the “Annexation of Unin habited Territory Act of 1939” (Stats. 1939, p. 1567; 2 Peering’s Gen. Laws 1944, Act 5162), the council of the town of Corte Madera by resolution initiated proceedings to annex three separate parcels of uninhabited territory, each of which was contiguous to the town as then bounded, but no one of which was contiguous to either of the others. One of these parcels, containing 15 acres, is owned entirely by Carton Label Lithograph…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- City of Burlingame v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- City of Burbank v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.