Legal Opinion

People v. City of Lemoore

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1918No. Civ. No. 1810PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the -opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The purpose of the proceeding was to test the validity of an attempted annexation to the city of Lemoore of 308% acres of land designated as “the 1916 addition to the city of Lemoore.” A general demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and defendant declining to answer, judgment was rendered in accordance with the prayer of the complaint annulling such purported annexation. The question, therefore, is as to the sufficiency of the complaint to justify the decree.

It is not disputed that there are in force in California three separate statutes under which annexations of territory to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wild v. People ex rel. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Coy v. CoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  4. Anvil Hydraulic & Drainage Co. v. CodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  5. Linn County Bank v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Clark v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. City of Anaheim v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People Ex Rel. Strong v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API