Legal Opinion

McLean v. Continental Baking Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1941No. 28163PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

Plaintiff brought suit to recover for damages to his automobile resulting from a collision between it and a truck owned by defendant Continental Baking Company and driven by defendant John Nelson. Defendants filed an answer, which included, as part thereof, a cross-complaint by defendant baking company, and in their pleading defendants denied negligence on their part, alleged negligence on the part of plaintiff, and prayed for dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint and for recovery upon the baking company’s cross-complaint. The issues were tried to the court, sitting without a jury.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tutewiler v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Poland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mertens v. MertensWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Capital Transit Co. v. HollowayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Nicholson v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API