Legal Opinion

Silverstein v. Adams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1925No. 19165. Department OnePublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

By this action the plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. In the answer negligence was denied, and it was affirmatively pleaded that the plaintiff was guilty of. contributory negligence. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made and overruled. From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the defendant appeals.

The facts are these. The accident out of which the action grew…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McEvilla v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Johannessen v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  3. Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Tobias v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1967

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API