Legal Opinion

Capital Transit Co. v. Holloway

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1944No. 159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Associate Judge.

This appeal concerns a type of automobile collision which happens with great frequency — one between a motorist pulling away from a parked position at the curb and colliding with a vehicle in a lane of through traffic. Here such a motorist was plaintiff and sued the defendant transit company for damages allegedly caused by one of its buses. Trial was by the court and resulted in a finding for plaintiff. We are ordering a reversal on the sole ground that plaintiff’s own testimony showed him to have been negligent.

The important parts of plaintiff’s • testimony were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dee v. City of PeruIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cronin v. Shell Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Faucett v. BergmannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  5. McLean v. Continental Baking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shu v. BasingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Brown v. ClancyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Davis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Johnson v. EnfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of D. C. v. GriffithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API